Canon Powershot SX100 IS Summary

The budget ultra-zoom category is sparsely populated by the Panasonic TZ3, Panasonic TZ2, the Fuji S700 and now the Canon SX100. Unfortunately for Fuji, the S700 is neither compact nor more capable than the SX100, thus making it less desirable for its target market.

The TZ3, being another compact ultra-zoom, competes directly with the SX100. Image quality is perhaps slightly better on the Canon, with the Canon sporting a higher-quality lens but producing noisier images (surprisingly this is the opposite that generally happens with other competing models from Canon and Panasonic). In terms of features the SX100 is much more capable with its full manual controls, wider shutter-speed and ISO ranges. However, the Panasonic TZ3 has a wide-angle lens equivalent to 28-280mm compared to the Canon Powershot SX100's 36-360mm. Whichever is better depends largely on the type of photography you do. Indoor and architecture photographers prefer a wide-angle lens, while sports and wildlife shooters prefer more telephoto reach.

The bottom line is that no other digital camera features this feature-set in such a compact size. Those looking for a compact ultra-zoom will be quite satisfied with the Canon SX100 unless you deem having a wide-angle essential. In that case, the Panasonic TZ3 is the only way to go, but you will lose important features such as manual controls and the ability to use AA batteries.

Neocamera detailed review Read the full Canon Powershot SX100 review.